ISIOLO SMART SURVEY 2024
Kenya
Ministry of Health
Created on
February 07, 2025
Last modified
February 07, 2025
Page views
31000
Download
635
Documentation in PDF
Metadata
DDI/XML
JSON
- Data files
- Isiolo_2024_hh
- Isiolo_2024_hl
- Isiolo_2024_wm
- Isiolo_2024_cm
comment (comment)
Data file: Isiolo_2024_hh
Overview
Valid:
424
Type:
Discrete
Width:
124
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absent | 2 |
0.5%
|
|
| Absent household. Travelled for a burial. | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Active | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Answered | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Answered well | 2 |
0.5%
|
|
| Care giver had muac less than 21cm we referred | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Child booklet date of birth not documented by facility | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Child refered to SFP | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Child was in program | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Cooperative | 7 |
1.7%
|
|
| Cooperative respondent | 5 |
1.2%
|
|
| Coperative | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Copperative | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Elderly | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Eligible child and her mother were travelling this morning to isiolo not yet back evening | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Good | 2 |
0.5%
|
|
| Good communication | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Good flow in questionnaire | 3 |
0.7%
|
|
| Good flow in the questionare | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Good flow in the questionnaire | 5 |
1.2%
|
|
| Good flow of questionnaire | 3 |
0.7%
|
|
| Good flow of the questionnaire | 2 |
0.5%
|
|
| Good flow questionnaire | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Goodflow in the questionaire | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Hh absent | 2 |
0.5%
|
|
| Hh poor food security | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Hh, I travelled to Isiolo. | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Household head is a single father | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Household revisited | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Interview was good | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| It was good | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Mother is single | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Mother lost her child boolet | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Namaiya not present | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No challenge encountered | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No child booklet | 3 |
0.7%
|
|
| No children | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No children under five | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No comment | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No comments | 9 |
2.1%
|
|
| No language barrier and good flow in the questinaire | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No language barrier,the respondent was welcoming | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No under 5 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No under five | 6 |
1.4%
|
|
| No under five children | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| No under fives | 2 |
0.5%
|
|
| None | 183 |
43.2%
|
|
| Ntadakwa lesangurikuri age determination was by recall card not available. | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| One child called jumale is already in OTP programme | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| One child had no child booklet | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| One child with MAM | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Poor hh with food security | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Refused to consent | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Responded | 6 |
1.4%
|
|
| Responded well | 8 |
1.9%
|
|
| Respondent Welcoming | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondent so welcoming | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Respondent was welcoming | 2 |
0.5%
|
|
| Respondent welcoming | 5 |
1.2%
|
|
| Revisited | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Revisited still absent | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Revisited still not available | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Revisited the household | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Sarah was not in during the survey | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| She is in nutritional programme | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Sube was not present for MUAC taking | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The caregiver gave birth in past 24 month but the child passed away at 19 months of age. | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The caregiver is expectant | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The caregiver is pregnant | 3 |
0.7%
|
|
| The caregiver stays with 5 children from her sister who is unwell | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The child has MAM and was referred SFP | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The child has chicken pox | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The child has hydrocephalus, history of spinal surgery and disability of the legs | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The child indicated Moderate acute malnutrition and we referred the child to the nearest hospital | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The child is MAM | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The child is malnourished | 2 |
0.5%
|
|
| The child referred for nutrition intervention | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The children are twins | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The household members were absent even after revisiting | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The household members were absent even after revisiting twice | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The household was closed even after second revisit | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The household were absent after revisit | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The households were revisited thrice, but there was no one seen/found | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The interview questionnaire was good | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The interview was good | 18 |
4.2%
|
|
| The interview was ok | 2 |
0.5%
|
|
| The malnourished child lack appetite | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The mother and child already in sfp program | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The mother is pregnant | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The mother is single | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The mother lost child booklet | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The mother lost her child booklet | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The mother was more cooperative | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The old is a single father | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The questionnaire is flowing | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The respondent has an ulcer | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The respondent was welcoming | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The wife left home for school . The children are staying with their grandmother in another village different from their home | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The wife left home with the children | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| The wife left with the children. The man is staying alone at the time of the interview | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Visit complete | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Welcoming | 2 |
0.5%
|
|
| Welcoming in the household | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Well | 2 |
0.5%
|
|
| Well cooperative | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Well copareted | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| Well responded | 57 |
13.4%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.