African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) 2014
Kenya, 2014
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS)
Created on
September 16, 2022
Last modified
September 16, 2022
Page views
305871
Download
1035
Documentation in PDF
Metadata
DDI/XML
JSON
- Data files
- hh_level
- hh_listings
5.7 Specify (hh57_10s)
Data file: hh_level
Overview
Valid:
61
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Width:
35
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACADEMIC QUALIFICATION | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| BECAUSE HE HELPED THE COMMUNITY | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| CAMPAIGN | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| CANDIDATES MANIFESTO | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| CANGE IN LEADERS | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| CHANGE FOR BETTER | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| CHANGE FOR THE BETTER | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| CHANGE IN GOVERNANCE,PEACE AND UNIT | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| CHANGE IN LEADERS | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| CHANGE IN LEADERSHIP | 3 |
4.9%
|
|
| CHANGE OF POLITICAL SYSTEM | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| COHESION | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| CORRUPTION | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| DEVELOPMENT RECORD | 3 |
4.9%
|
|
| DEVELOPMENT RECORDS | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| DIFFERENCE IN LEADERSHIP AND GOVERN | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| DOES NOT KNOW | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| EDUCATION | 2 |
3.3%
|
|
| EDUCATION & AGE | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| EUPHOLIA | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| EUPHORIA | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| EXERCISE THEIR RIGHT | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| FAME | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| FOLLOW MAJORITY OF THE VOTERS | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| HELP | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| HELPING THE DISADVANTAGED | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| HISTORY OF THE CANDIDATE | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| INSECURITY | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| ITS OUR RIGHT | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| LEAD BY SPIRIT | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| LEVEL OF EDUCATION | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| NO PROPER EDUCATION | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| PERFORMANCE IN PREVIOUS TERMS | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| POLITICAL OBLIGATION | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| POLITICAL RIGHT | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| Performance in previous terms | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| REQUIREMENT BY LAW | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| RIGGING | 2 |
3.3%
|
|
| RIGHT TO VOTE | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| THE WORK THE CANDIDATE DOES TO COMM | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| THEIR RIGHT TO VOTE | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| TRIBALISM | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| VOTED BECAUSE IT IS A RIGHT TO VOTE | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| WANTED CHANGE | 2 |
3.3%
|
|
| WANTED CHANGE IN GOVERNANACE | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| WANTED CHANGE IN LEADER | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| ability to solve probl. in communit | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| accessibility of candidates | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| age [young] | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| change in governance | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| how one felt | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| level of education | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| performance in community | 1 |
1.6%
|
|
| performance of the candidate | 1 |
1.6%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.