Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
ABOLISHED ALREADY & REPLACED BY TRIO | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
ADMINISTRATION COST IS HIGH | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
ADMINISTRATIVE COST. TOO MUCH BUREAUCRACY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS ARE TOO HIGH | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
ADMINISTRTIVE EXPENSES | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
BUREAUCRACY IN THE GOVERNMENT SYSTEM | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
BUREAUCRACY IS TOO MUCH | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
BUREAUCRACY MAKE NOT USER FRIENDLY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
BUREAUCRANCY IN INDUSTRY OF TRADE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
CAN NOT QUALIFY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
COMPLICATED PROCESS/COMPETITIVE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
DISCOURAGED DUE TO CHANGE OF RULES | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
DO NOT EXPORT DIRECTLY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
DO NOT NEED | 2 |
2.6%
|
|
DO NOT NEED FACILITIES | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
DO NOT USE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
DOES NOT DEED. | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
DON'T QUALIFY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
DONT KNOW ABOUT IT | 2 |
2.6%
|
|
EXPORT COMPONENT TOO LOW | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
EXPORT TAKE SMALL PROPORTION OF BUSINESS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
FOR TEXTILE INDUSTRIES | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
GOV'T BUREACRACY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
GOVERNMENT APPROVAL FOR EACH EXPORT CONSIGNMENT | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
GOVERNMENT HAVE BEEN RELUCTANT TO GIVE US | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
HAS BEEN BENEFICIAL BUT NO LONGER APPLICABLE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
HAS CLOSED DOWN | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
HAS LED TO ONCREASE ON PROFITABILITY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
HAS NOT BOTHERED TO APPLY FOR COMPESATION | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
HAS USED THE FACILITY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
HAVE BEEN USING THE FACILITY EVER SINCE ESTABLISHMENT | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
HIGH ADMINISTRATION COST | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
INDISPENSABLE- TO ENABLE IT COMPETE IN INTERNATIONAL MKT | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
IT HAS BEEN SCRAPPED | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
IT IS MORE DIFFICULT & BUREAUCRATIC | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
IT MAKES NO DEFFERENCE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
IT WAS GOOD BUT NO LONGER THERE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
LEVEL FIELD MISSING | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NEVER EXPLOITED THEM | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NO COMMENT | 3 |
3.9%
|
|
NO LONGER APPLICABLE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NO PROBLEM | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NOT CONSIDERED | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NOT IN LINE WITH HIS BUSSINESS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NOT REGULAR EXPORTERS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NOT USEFUL | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NOT WITHIN THE EPZ PRODUCTION PROCESS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NOT WITHIN THE LINE OF BUSINESS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NOT WITHIN THE LINE OF PRODUCTION | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
NOW OPERATES UNDER TREO | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
OF SLIGHT BENEFIT TO COMPANY. | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
REDUNDANT | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
RESPONDENT DIDN'T UNDERSTAND SOME OF THIS LAWS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
SECTOR NOT COVERED | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
SHOULD BE REINTRODUCED OR THE TREO SYSTEM STREAMLINED | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
STOPPED DUE TO TOO MUCH BOTTLENECKS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
STOPPED ON SOME PRODUCTS BECAUSE DUTIES SO LOW ANYWAY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
STOPPED WHEN DUTY WAS ZERO RATED ON RAW MATERIA | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
THE BENEFIT/REFUND HAS BEEN MINIMAL | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
THE LAW HAS BEEN CHANGED | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF EXPORTATION GROWTH SINCE 2000 | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
THERE IS REDUCTION IN COST | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
TIME CONSUMING | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
TOO EXPENSIVE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
TOO MUCH BUREAUCRACY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
TOO MUCH PAPER WORK/BUREACRACY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
USED TO BE GOOD BUT NO LONGER APPLICABLE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
USED TO BE THERE BUT NO LONGER APPLICABLE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
VOLUME OF SALES LOST | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
WAS BENEFICIAL BUT NO LONGER APPLICABLE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
WAS USING THE FACILITY BUT IT TURNED TO BE CUMBRSOME. | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
WE LIKE IT BECAUSE ITS WELL UNDERSTOOD | 1 |
1.3%
|