| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABOLISHED ALREADY & REPLACED BY TRIO | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| ADMINISTRATION COST IS HIGH | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| ADMINISTRATIVE COST. TOO MUCH BUREAUCRACY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS ARE TOO HIGH | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| ADMINISTRTIVE EXPENSES | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| BUREAUCRACY IN THE GOVERNMENT SYSTEM | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| BUREAUCRACY IS TOO MUCH | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| BUREAUCRACY MAKE NOT USER FRIENDLY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| BUREAUCRANCY IN INDUSTRY OF TRADE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| CAN NOT QUALIFY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| COMPLICATED PROCESS/COMPETITIVE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| DISCOURAGED DUE TO CHANGE OF RULES | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| DO NOT EXPORT DIRECTLY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| DO NOT NEED | 2 |
2.6%
|
|
| DO NOT NEED FACILITIES | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| DO NOT USE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| DOES NOT DEED. | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| DON'T QUALIFY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| DONT KNOW ABOUT IT | 2 |
2.6%
|
|
| EXPORT COMPONENT TOO LOW | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| EXPORT TAKE SMALL PROPORTION OF BUSINESS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| FOR TEXTILE INDUSTRIES | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| GOV'T BUREACRACY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT APPROVAL FOR EACH EXPORT CONSIGNMENT | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT HAVE BEEN RELUCTANT TO GIVE US | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| HAS BEEN BENEFICIAL BUT NO LONGER APPLICABLE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| HAS CLOSED DOWN | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| HAS LED TO ONCREASE ON PROFITABILITY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| HAS NOT BOTHERED TO APPLY FOR COMPESATION | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| HAS USED THE FACILITY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| HAVE BEEN USING THE FACILITY EVER SINCE ESTABLISHMENT | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| HIGH ADMINISTRATION COST | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| INDISPENSABLE- TO ENABLE IT COMPETE IN INTERNATIONAL MKT | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| IT HAS BEEN SCRAPPED | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| IT IS MORE DIFFICULT & BUREAUCRATIC | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| IT MAKES NO DEFFERENCE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| IT WAS GOOD BUT NO LONGER THERE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| LEVEL FIELD MISSING | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| NEVER EXPLOITED THEM | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| NO COMMENT | 3 |
3.9%
|
|
| NO LONGER APPLICABLE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| NO PROBLEM | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| NOT CONSIDERED | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| NOT IN LINE WITH HIS BUSSINESS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| NOT REGULAR EXPORTERS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| NOT USEFUL | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| NOT WITHIN THE EPZ PRODUCTION PROCESS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| NOT WITHIN THE LINE OF BUSINESS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| NOT WITHIN THE LINE OF PRODUCTION | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| NOW OPERATES UNDER TREO | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| OF SLIGHT BENEFIT TO COMPANY. | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| REDUNDANT | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| RESPONDENT DIDN'T UNDERSTAND SOME OF THIS LAWS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| SECTOR NOT COVERED | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| SHOULD BE REINTRODUCED OR THE TREO SYSTEM STREAMLINED | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| STOPPED DUE TO TOO MUCH BOTTLENECKS | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| STOPPED ON SOME PRODUCTS BECAUSE DUTIES SO LOW ANYWAY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| STOPPED WHEN DUTY WAS ZERO RATED ON RAW MATERIA | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| THE BENEFIT/REFUND HAS BEEN MINIMAL | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| THE LAW HAS BEEN CHANGED | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF EXPORTATION GROWTH SINCE 2000 | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| THERE IS REDUCTION IN COST | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| TIME CONSUMING | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| TOO EXPENSIVE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| TOO MUCH BUREAUCRACY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| TOO MUCH PAPER WORK/BUREACRACY | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| USED TO BE GOOD BUT NO LONGER APPLICABLE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| USED TO BE THERE BUT NO LONGER APPLICABLE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| VOLUME OF SALES LOST | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| WAS BENEFICIAL BUT NO LONGER APPLICABLE | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| WAS USING THE FACILITY BUT IT TURNED TO BE CUMBRSOME. | 1 |
1.3%
|
|
| WE LIKE IT BECAUSE ITS WELL UNDERSTOOD | 1 |
1.3%
|