| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BETTER TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| COST REDUCTION | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| COST SAVING/NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENTY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| CTS. | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| DEMAND ON THEIR PRODUCTS WAS LOW. | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| DIVERSIFY PRODUCTION | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| ECONOMY IS BAD SO NO NEED TO INVEST | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| EXPENSIVE TO INVEST IN NEW TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| FRUSTRATIONS OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT POLICY OF EMPLOYMENT | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| HIGH QUALITY OF PRODUCTS. | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| HIGH TAXATION | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| IMPROVE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| IMPROVE ON PACKAGING | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| IMPROVE ON QUALITY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| IMPROVE QUALITY OF PRODUCTS TO MAKE THEM MORE COMPETITIVE | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| IMPROVING PRODUCTS | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| INCREASE PRODUCTION | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| INCREASE PRODUCTION & CAPACITY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| MARKET FOR THE PRODUCT SMALL | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| NO INCENTIVES TO INVEST AND NO RESORCES TO DO SO. | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| NO MONEY FOR INVESTMENT IN NEW TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| NON AVAILABILITY OF PACKAGING MATERIALS LOCALLY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| PRODUCTIVITY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| PROGRAMMING | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| TO ICREASE PRODUTION | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| TO IMPROVE ON THE QUALITY OF PRODUCTS. | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| TO IMPROVE PRODUCTION PROCESS | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| TO IMPROVE PRODUCTS QUALITY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| TO UPGRADE OPERATIONS | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| TOWELING TECHNOLOGY | 1 |
3.1%
|
|
| UT INCREASE QUALITY | 1 |
3.1%
|