unusual circumstances (q9013)
Data file: WHS-Kenya_F5
Overview
Valid:
3094
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Width:
80
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Literal question
Any unusual circumstances or happenings during the interview:
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 2 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 3 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 4 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 5 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A BIT OF INTERRUPTIONS FROM THE BABY THE RESPONDENT QUITE COOPERATIVE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A FEW INTERRUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A GRANDCHILD PASSED AND THE FAMILY WAS SAD. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A LOT OF DISTURBANCES FROM NEIGHBOURS KEEN TO KNOW WHAT'S HAPPENING THE GIRL IS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A LOT OF INTERFEARANCES AS SHE WAS LOOKING AFTER CATTLE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A LOT OF INTERRUPTIONS DURING INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A LOT OF MEMORY LAPSE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A NICE INTERVIEW WITHOUT ANY INTERRUPTION AT ALL. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A VERY COMPETITIVE RESPONDENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A VERY GOOD INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A VERY GOOD INTERVIEW ENDED WELL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A VERY GOOD INTERVIEW WHICH ACTUALLY STARTED WELL AND ENDED WELL. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A VERY GOOD INTERVIEW WHICH STARTED WELL AND ENDED WELL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A VISITOR INTERRUPTED THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| AFTER HOUSEHOLD QUESTIONARE, VISITORS CAME, STOPPED FOR ALMOST 2 HOURS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| AGE CAUSED MEMORY LAPSE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| AGES AT DEATH OF THE DEAD SIBLINGS AND THE CAUSES OF DEATH IS NOT KNOWN TO THE R | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ALLOWED TO REST,GAVE BIRTH RECENTLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ALOT OF INTERFERENCES BY OTHERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ALOT OF INTERUPTION BY RELATIVES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ALOT OF INTERUPTION FROM NEIGHBOURS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ALOT OF INTERUPTION FROM THE BABY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| AN INTERPRATER WAS USED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| AN OLD OF 72 YEARS AND VERY AND FIT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ASK MANY GOOD QUESTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ASSISTED BY DAUGHTER IN LAW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ATTENDING CHILD CHORES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ATTENDING TO HOUSEHOLD CHORES WHILE BEING INTERVIEED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| AVERY EDUCATED RESPONDENT AND HENCE THE INTERVIEW ENDED NICELY AND IN GOOD TIME. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| An intepreter was used | 1 |
0%
|
|
| BAD ATITITUDE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| BLANK PAGES IN THE QUESTIONNAIRE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| BREAK FOR SOMETIME | 1 |
0%
|
|
| BUSY RESPONDENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CHILD CRIED OFTENLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CHILD CRYING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CHILD SUDDENLY FELL SICK AND RUSHED TO THE HOSPITAL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CHILD WITH FEVER-OCCASSINAL CRYING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CHILDREN INTERRUPTION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CO-OPERATIVE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COMFORTABLE WITH SENSITIVE QUESTIONNAIRE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COMMUNITY CAME AROUND | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COMPLAIN ABOUT THE QUESTIONNAIRE BEING TOO LONG. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COMPLAINED OF HER HEALTH DURING INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COMPLETED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COMPLETED INTERVIEW THE 2ND DAY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CONSUMED MORE TIME | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COOKING, WHILE INTERVIEW WAS GOING ON | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COOPERATED HASTELY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COOPERATION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COOPERATIVE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COOPERATIVE LADY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COUGHING TREMEDIUSLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COULD COUGH AFTER 20 MINUTES OR SO. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COULD NOT RESPOND WELL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COULD STRETCH OUT HANDS AND SIGH CONTINOUSLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COZ HE WAS DRUNK,RESPONDENT CAUSED INTERFERENCES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CRIES FROM THE YOUNG KID | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CUSTOMER CAME TO BUY VEGETABLES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Cannot tell ages | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DEMANDED PAYMENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DIFRENCES AROSE REQUIRING TEMPORARY DISCONTINUATION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISRRUPTIONS FROM HIS DISABLED DAUGHTER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISRUPTIONS TO ATTEND TO OTHER BUSINESSES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISTUNANCE BY CHILD CRY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISTURBANCE BY CHILDREN | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DISTURBANCE BY RESPONDENTS SON | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISTURBANCE FROM VISITORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISTURBANCES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISTURBANCES FROM VISITORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISTURBANCES BY CHILDREN | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISTURBED BY CUSTOMERS IN THE SHOP | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISTURBUNCE BY A DRUNKARD | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DO NOT VALUE HOSPITAL HENCE THE FAMILY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DRUNK AND IMPATIENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DRUNKARD | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DUE TO LANGUAGE DIFFERENCES WE HAD TO USE AN INTERPRETOR | 1 |
0%
|
|
| FEW INTERUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| FINE | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| FINE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| FORCED TO USE AN INTERPRETER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| FREQUENT INTERRUPTION BY CHILDREN. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| FREQUENTLY ATTENDING TO DOMESTIC CHORES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Followed the respondent to her place of work | 1 |
0%
|
|
| GOOD AT EVERY QUESTION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HAD TO REFER CERTAIN THINGS TO SPOUSE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HAD TO REFER TO OTHER PERSONS FOR CLARITY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HAD TO SIT VERY CLOSE TO HER EAR | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HAD TO STOP THE INTERVIEW TILL EVENING FOR THE 'R' WAS TO GO BACK TO WORK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HAS ALOT OF ASSISTANCE (FINANCIAL) EXPECTATIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HAS BIRTH RECORDS AND COULD REFERS. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HAS STRONG NEGATIVE ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE GOVERMENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HE DOESNT HAVE A LOT OF INFORMATION ON HIS STEP BROTHERS AND SISTERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HEARING PROBLEM | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HEARING PROBLEM DELAYED THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HEARINH PROBLEM | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HER DAUGHTER WHO IS MENTALLY ILL WAS A BOTHER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HER UNDERSTANDING WAS VERY LOW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HIS TURNBOY FRIENDS CAME AND DISTURBED ME ALOT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HSEHOLD MEMBER QUESTIONED THE RATIONALE BEHIND SURVEYS THAT NEVER RESULT TO ANY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HUSBAND CAME SHORTLY AND WENT AWAY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HUSBAND AND OTHER PEOPLE CAME IN DURING THE INTERVIEW. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HUSBAND OF THE RESPONDENT WAS DRUNK SO HE KEPT ON INTERRUPTING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HUSBAND WAS CURIOUS WHEN ASKED TO REMAIN ALONE WITH WIFE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| I WAS ASKED TO EXPLIAN WHY JUST THE OTHER DAY A SAME SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED AND NO | 1 |
0%
|
|
| I WAS ASSISTED BY SOMEBODY TO MAKE POINTS CLEAR TO HER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| I WAS STRONGLY QUESTIONED SINCE THEY DONT BELIEVE IN STRANGERS IN THE H/HOLDS DU | 1 |
0%
|
|
| IN THE INITIAL STAGES OF THE INTERVIEW, THE HUSBAND INSISTED ON FOLLOWING THE IN | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERESTING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERFERENCE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERFERENCE BY OTHERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERFERENCE FROM HOSTILE FAMILY MEMBER - (CO-WIFE) | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERFERENCE FROM LOCAI PPLE DEMANDING ALCOL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERFERENCE IN THE PROCESS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERFERENCES IN BETWEEN THE PROCESS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERRUPTED BY CONFLICTS FROM NEIGHBOURS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTED BY VISITORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION BY CHILDREN | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION BY CHILDREN CRYING AND FEEDING CHILD | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION BY DRUNKERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION BY HER CHILDREN. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION BY VISITORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION BY VISTORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION IN BETWEEN THE INTERVIEW PROCESS. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION MOST OF THE TIME BY FAMILY MEMBERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS | 10 |
0.3%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS FROM CLIENTS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS BY FRIENDS RESPONDENT WAS VERY NEGATIVE AOUT THE SURVERY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS BY RELATIVES. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS BY SOME OUTSIDERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS BY VISITORS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS DURING INTERVIEW | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS FROM CUSTOMERS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS FROM FRIENDS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS OF EXCITED MEMBERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS PERIODICALLY ON THE SECOND DAY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS WITH HOUSEHOLD CHORES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERUPTION BY CALLS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION BY CHILDREN FROM SCHOOL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION BY CUSTOMER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION BY CUSTOMERS IN THE SHOP | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION BY DRUNKEN COLLEGUES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION BY RELATIVE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION BY THE MOTHER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION BY VISITORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION FROM RELATIVES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTIONS | 5 |
0.2%
|
|
| INTERUPTIONS BY FRIENDS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTIONS BY MEMBERS OF THE HOUSEHOLD | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTIONS BY VISITORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTIONS FROM HER DRUNKEN SONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW POSTPONED FOR UNAVOIDABLE REASONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW CARRIED BEHIND THE GATE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW WENT ON WELL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN A SHAMBA IN UNCOMFORTABLE CONDITION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN A VERY BUSY SHOP SO ALOT OF TIME HAD TO BE TAKEN PRIVACY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW ENDED NICELY | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERVIEW ENDED NICELY. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW INTERUPTED BY VISITORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW MOVED ON WELL. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW WAS A NICE ONE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW WENT ON NICELY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW WENT ON WELL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEWED IN THE CAR FOR PRIVACY PURPOSES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEWED IN THE GARDEN WHILE DIGGING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTRUPTION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| IT STARTED TO BECOME DARK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| IT WAS DONE IN HOSPITAL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Interruption by husband | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Interruptions by children | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Interruptions by hostile employer | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Interuption during interview | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Interview ended nicely | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Interview went on nicely | 1 |
0%
|
|
| It took alot of pleading to get information regarding the household from the res | 1 |
0%
|
|
| LANGUAGE BARRIER(TRANSLATION WAS DONE) | 1 |
0%
|
|
| LOT OF INTERRUPTION FROM CUSTOMERS WHO NEEDED TO BE SERVED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MANY VISITORS THUS ALOT OF INTERRUPTIONS. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINIMUM INTERFERENCE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINIMUM INTERFERENCE IN THE PROCESS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINIMUM INTERRUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINOR INTERRUPTIONS DURING THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINOR INTERRUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINOR INTERRUPTIONS BY CHILDREN | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| MINOR INTERRUPTIONS BY CHLDREN | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINOR INTERRUPTIONS BY CUSTOMERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINOR INTERRUPTIONS BY FRIENDS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINOR INTERRUPTIONS BY NEIGHBOURS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINOR INTERRUPTIONS BY PASSERSBY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINOR INTERUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MOTHER AND CHILD HAVE GOITRE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MOVEMENT UP AND DOWN DURING THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Many visitors coming in | 1 |
0%
|
|
| N/A | 7 |
0.2%
|
|
| NEED OF BREAK IN BETWEEN INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NEIGHBOUR INTERRUPTED AND DELAYED INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NEIGHBOURS WALKING IN AND OUT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NIL | 11 |
0.4%
|
|
| NO | 173 |
5.6%
|
|
| NO AMOUNT OF INTERFERANCE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO AMOUNT OF INTERFERENCE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO COMMENT | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| NO COMMENTS | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| NO DISTURBANCES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO INTERFERANCE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO INTERFERENCE | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| NO INTERFERNCE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO INTERRUPTIONS | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| NO INTERUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO MEMBER OF THE HOUSHOLD HAS SOUGHT FOR HEALTH CARE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO PROBLEM | 32 |
1%
|
|
| NO PROBLEM DURING THE INTERVIEW. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO PROBLEM. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO UNUSUAL CERCUMSTANCES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO UNUSUAL HAPPENINGS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NON | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NONE | 2060 |
66.6%
|
|
| NONE BUT TRIED TO AVOID THE INTERVIEW AT THE BEGINING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NONE. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NOT CO-OPERATIVE AT FIRST. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NOT CONCENTRATING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NOT COOPERATIVE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NOT VERY WILLING TO RESPOND | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NOTHING | 26 |
0.8%
|
|
| NOTHING UNUSUAL HAPPENED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| NOTHING UNUSUAL. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| No | 192 |
6.2%
|
|
| None | 60 |
1.9%
|
|
| O.K | 1 |
0%
|
|
| OK | 6 |
0.2%
|
|
| OLD AGE AND ABIT OF MENTAL INSTABILITY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| OLD AND KNOWLEDGEABLE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| OLD RESPONDENT FORCING YOU TO INVOLVE OTHERS ON INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONNAIRE. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| OVER STAYING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| PEACEFUL CONDUCTED INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| PLANNING TO GO FOR WORK(BUSINESS) | 1 |
0%
|
|
| POLYGAMAS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| POOR MEMORY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| PREPARING FOOD FOR HER CHILD | 1 |
0%
|
|
| PREPARING TO GO FOR HER BUSINESS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| PREPARING SUPPER DURING INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Paused for 30 min because she had to take the cows to the river | 1 |
0%
|
|
| QN TOO LONG | 1 |
0%
|
|
| REFUSAL TO TELL ABOUT BROTHERS AND SISTERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RELATIVE DISSAPPROVAL OF THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPODENT STRESSED ISSUE OF NEGATIVE ATITUDE BY NURSES ESPECIALLY LABOUR WARD AN | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT NOT WILLING TO ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS OFTEN INTERRUPTED BY CUSTOMERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT AGED ,BAD HEALTH AND LIVING ALONE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT BECAME NERVOUS ABOUT "INCOME INDICATORS" AND THE INTERVIEW STOPPED TI | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT COULD BARELY REMEMBER OLD EVENTS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT COULD NOT RESPOND TO SOME QUESTIONS NEED TO CALL THE MOTHER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT HAD TO ATTEND TO FAMILY ISSUES DURING THE INTERVIEW (5-10 MIN INTERVA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT HAS A COMPLETLY DEFORMED CHILD AND MENTALLY RETARDED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT HAS ARTHRITIS AND MENTAL DISEASE, SHE IS ON DRUGS. LEVEL OF MOERBIDIT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT HAS LOW VOICE - NECK OPERATION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT HAVING BREAK FOR LUNCH | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT INTERVIEWED IN SCHOOL | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| RESPONDENT IS A PRITON - NOT STAYED LONG IN KENYA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT IS NOT READY TO DISCUSS OR GIVE NAMES OF SIBLINGS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT KEPT DOZING OFF | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT LOST HUSBAND | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT NEEDED ALOT OF PROBING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT PREFFERED TO BE ASSISTED BY THE WIFE IN ANSWERING. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT RECOVERING FROM INJURIES IN A ROAD ACCIDENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT REFUSED TO ANSWER MOST OF THE QUESTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT REFUSED TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ON VIGNETTES 7000 AND 8000 SECTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT STOPPED INTERVIEW FOR 2 HOURS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT TOOK 30 MINUTES TEA BREAK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT UNDER ALCOHOL INTOXICATION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT UNDERSTANDING WAS VERY LOW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT VERY BUSY SHAVING CUSTOMERS, HAD TO WAIT TO GET CHANCE WHEN HE IS THR | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS ABIT PARANOID AND CONFUSED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS ALITTLE DRUNK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS ATTENDING TO CUSTOMERS AT THE SHOP DURING THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS AWAY AND HAD TO WAIT. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS BUSY BUT COMPLETED NEXT DAY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS DIZZINESS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS DOZING OFF DURING THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS DRUNK DURING THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS SLOW IN ANSWERING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS VERY SUPERTICIOUS ABOUT DISEASES AND MEDICINE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESTLESS RESPONDENT AT FINAL STAGES OF INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Respondent could not remember most events e.g the birth dates of her siblings | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Respondent kept on forgetting certain items | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Respondent stammers | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Respondent was unable to recall births by mother | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Respondent went away briefly and so had to make a call back at about 15:45 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SEEMS DRUNK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SELLING MEAT AS WE TALK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SEVERAL INTERRUPTIONS BY HUSBAND | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SHE HAD A MENTALLY DISTURBED CHILD SO ALOT OF INTERUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SHE IS ILLITERATE SO SHE HAD ALOT OF PROBLEMS UNDERSTANDING. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SHE REJECTED CALL BACK, VILLAGE ELDER INTERVENED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SHE WAS BUSY CULTIVATING WHILE BEING INTERVIEWED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SIBLING INFORMATION GIVEN BY PERENTS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SICKNESS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SLIGHT INTERRUPTION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SLIGHT INTERRUPTION BY YOUNG CHILD (INFANT) | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SLIGHTLY DRUNK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SLOW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SLOW IN ANSWERING QUESTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SLOW IN RESPONDING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SMALL INTERUPTION BY VISITORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SO MUCH INTERRUPTIONS, CROWDING, QUESTION. USED AN INTERPRETOR; COULD NOT UNDERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SOME DISTURBANCE BY KIDS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SOME INTERRUPTION DURING INTERVIEW. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SOME INTERRUPTIONS BY DRUNK NEIGHBOURS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SOME INTERRUPTIONS DUE TO ATTENDING OTHER RESPONSIBILITIES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SOME SLIGHT INTERUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SOMEHOW COOPERATIVE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| STUBBORN | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SUCCESFUL/NONE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SUSPICIOUS BREW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Several people were interupting to know what is going on | 1 |
0%
|
|
| She wanted to go sell her wares | 1 |
0%
|
|
| She was coughing and sneezing continously | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Sick Child crying | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Some members of the community present during the interview | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TALKATIVE RESPONDENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TALKS MUCH POLYGAMOUS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TEA BREAK FOR 20 MINUTES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS TO ATTEND OTHER BUSINESS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS PERSUADED BUT REFUSED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT TIRED COZ SHE DELIVERED SAME DAY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE HUSBAND IS A CHANGAA BREWER WO HAD TO BE CONVINCED WHILE THE INTERVIEW WAS O | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW ENDED NICELY | 13 |
0.4%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW ENDED VERY NICELY. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW MOVED ON NICELY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW STARTED VERY WELL AND ENDED VERY WELL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW STARTED WEKK AND ENDED WELL , WELL INFORMED RESPONDENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW STARTED WELL & ENDED WELL | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW STARTED WELL AND ENDED WELL | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE ON OFF DUE TO A SICK CHILD | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS INTERUPTED SEVERALY BY THE LAST CHILD WHO KEPT ON CRYING AND S | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS OKEY EXCEPT THE RESPONDENT WAS SLOW ABIT. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS PARTIALY DONE BECAUSE THE RESPONDENT WAS IN RUSH AND COULD NOT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW WENT ON NICELY | 11 |
0.4%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW WENT ON SMOOTHLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW WENT ON SMOOTHLY WITHOUT ANY PROBLEM | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE LIGHT WAS INSUFFICIENT SO READING WAS DIFFICULT CANDLES USED PROVIDED LITTLE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE MAN WAS TAKING A GLASS OF TRADITIONAL BEER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE MZEE WAS SENILE SO IT WAS VERY DIFFICULT. THE MAM OF THE MZEE HELPED IN SOME | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE REPONDENT WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT AIDS(TESTING), AND SAID HE WENT TO VCT CENTRE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT IS AGEING COULD NOT RESPOND. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS SICK AND IN PAIN | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT COULDN'T UNDERSTAND WELL. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT DID NOT KNOW THE AGES OF THE BROTHER AND SISTERS EVEN THE MOTHER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT HAD JUST BEEN DISCHARGED FROM HOSPITAL HENCE WAS STILL WEAK AND T | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT HAD PROBLEMS WITH UNDERSTANDING BOTH ENGLISH AND KISWAHILI | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT HAD SEVERE PROBLEMS UNDERSTANDING THE VIGNETTES HENCE RATING WAS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT HAD SOME UPS AND DOENS HENCE CUT DOWNS FOR INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT HAD TO GO AND WATER THE CATTLE IN BETWEEN THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT IS A RELIGIOUS FANATIC AND HAD PROBLEMS WITH | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT IS A SHOP KEEPER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT IS IN WHEEL CHAIR AND LIMBS NOT COORDINATING PROPERLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT IS NOT FREE ON CASES OF SEXUAL ACTIVITIES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT JUST DOES NOT UNDERSTAND AT ALL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT LEFT AT THE MIDDLE OF THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT REFUSED TO BE WEIGHED AT FIRST | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT REFUSED TO CONTINUE WITH THE INTERVIEW FROM SERIES 6000 DESPITE M | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS A BUSY SHOPKEEPER HENCE THE INTERVIEW SESSION WAS CONTINUALLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS DRUNK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS DRUNK AND BUZY SERVICING HER CUSTOMERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS IN A TOBACCO CURING KILN WHICH WAS RISKY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS IN HURRY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS INTERRUPTED FREQUENTLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT WILLING TO ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS AND WAS VERY IMOPATIENT H | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS QUITE TENSE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS SUSPICIOUS AND HAD REFUSED TO TAKE THE INTERVIEW BUT LATER CH | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY COOPERATIVE IN THE INTERVIEW EVEN IF HE LOST HIS WIFE JU | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WEPT DURING THE INTERVIEW IN REMEMBERENCE OF HER LATE SON | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WHO IS A UNIVERSITY GRADUATE A TEACHER BY PROFFESION HAD TO BE CO | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE SELECTED R FAITH WAS NOT AVAILABLE DURING THE INTERVIEW. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE TIMING ON THE QUESTIONARE WAS NOT ACCURATE. MY WATCH DEVELOPED A PROBLEM. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THEIR SUPPER WAS DELAYED DUE TO THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THERE WAS A BREAK BEFORE THE INTERVIEW CONTINUE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THERE WAS A BREAK FROM EARLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THERE WAS A TIME WHEN THE INTERVIEW WAS INTERRUPTED BY SOMEONE WHO WANTED TO TAL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THERE WAS DOMESTIC PROBLEM | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THERE WAS INTERRUPTION BY THE VISTORS. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THERE WAS INTERRUPTIONS BY VISITORS. THERE WERE FUNERALS IN THA PLACE SO THE RES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THERE WAS PROBLEM OF GETTING AGES BUT GAVE GOOD RESPONSE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THERE WERE INTERRUPTIONS DURING INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THOUGH THE RESPONDENT WAS MENTALLY ILL, HE WAS ABLE TO REASON AND VERY QUICK TO | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOBBACCO DEALER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOO DEMANDING FOR HELP(AID) | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOO MUCH DISTURBANCES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOO MUCH DRUNKARDS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOO MUCH INTERRUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOO MUCH INTERRUPTIONS WITH H/H CORES. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOO TALKATIVE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOOK LUNCH FOR 18 MINUTES - STOP INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOOK TIME FOR RESPONDENT TO UNDERSTAND QUESTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOTAL INTERFERANCE BY FAMILY MEMBER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| The interview started and ended nicely | 1 |
0%
|
|
| The interview went on nicely | 1 |
0%
|
|
| The respondent had a sick baby suffering from Malaria | 1 |
0%
|
|
| The respondent received visitors and was forced to terminate the interview for s | 1 |
0%
|
|
| The respondent was in a hurry | 1 |
0%
|
|
| The respondent was very ignorant even over the simplest questions | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Took time to answer | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Two visitors came and interrupted the interview for about 2 min | 1 |
0%
|
|
| UNCOMFATABLE WITH MALARIA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| USUAL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Use of intepreter | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY CO-OPERATIVE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY CO-OPERATIVE AND PATIENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY COMPETENT RESPONDENT HENCE THE INTERVIEW WENT ON NICELY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY COOPERATIVE | 6 |
0.2%
|
|
| VERY GOOD INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY GOOD INTERVIEW WHICH STARTED WELL AND ENDED WELL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY GOOD RESPONDENT HENCE VERY CO-OPERATIVE. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY GOOD RESPONDENT. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY SLOW TO RESPOND TO ANSWERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY STUBBORN WOMAN | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY STURBON | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY UNCO-OPERATIVE AND UNWILLING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VISITORS | 13 |
0.4%
|
|
| VISITORS AND YOUNG ONES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VISITORS BREAKS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VISITORS COMMING IN AND OUT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VISITORS` INTERUPTIONS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| VISTORS CAME FREQUENTLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Vaccination date was written in a book, no card | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Various interuptions | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Very good interview | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Very poor understanding | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Very sturbon initially and almost refused. Had to be forced into the interview b | 1 |
0%
|
|
| WAS VERY UNEASY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| WAS VERY WEAK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| WASHING CLOTHES RESPONDENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| WIFE WAS PRESENT DURING INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| YES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| YES, THE OLD MAN WAS CALLED TO RESOLVE A DOMESTIC QUARREL, THIS ALMOST INTERRUPT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Yes there were interuptions when a neighbour started fighting with the family | 1 |
0%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
var_qstn_ivuinstr
To be filled in by the interviewer at the end of the interview